At Unesc, the institutional evaluation schedule is organized based on the institution's Self-Assessment Project, which is in accordance with Law No. 10,861/2004, the External Institutional Evaluation Instrument of Inep/Mec, and Technical Note Inep/Daes/Conaes No. 65/2014.
In the table below, it is possible to visualize which axes and dimensions will be addressed annually.
| Cycle | Axis | Dimension |
|---|---|---|
| Year I | 1 – Institutional Planning and Evaluation | 8. Planning and Evaluation and Institutional Report |
| 2 – Institutional Development | 1. Mission and the Institutional Development Plan 3. Social Responsibility |
|
| Self-Assessment PPG | 1 – Program | |
| Year II | 3 – Academic Policies | 2. Policies for Teaching, Research, and Extension 4. Communication with Society 9. Student Support Policies |
| Self-Assessment PPG | 2 – Training | |
| 4 – Management Policies | 5. Personnel Policies 6. Organization and Management of the Institution 10. Financial Sustainability |
|
| Year III | 5 – Physical Infrastructure | 7. Physical Infrastructure |
| Self-Assessment PPG | 3 – Social Impact - Considering the specificities of Professional Programs | |
| Summary of all axes considering the Report – Final Part. | Global analysis regarding the PDI and the axes of the instrument, according to academic and management activities, presenting an action plan for improvement to the IES. |
Source: Prepared by CPA, UNESC
Check out some of the evaluations planned for 2024
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Ombudsman's Service
Respondents: Respondents
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Undergraduate Teaching
Respondents: Undergraduate Students and Professors
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Teaching in Technical Courses
Respondents: Students and Professors of Technical Courses
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of the Profile of Incoming Undergraduate Students
Respondents: Students and Newcomers
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of the Profiles of Graduate Students in Lato and Stricto Sensu Programs
Respondents: Newcomers
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of the Courses in Lato Sensu Graduate Programs (Conducted in Partnership with the Lato Sensu Graduate Sector)
Respondents: Students in Lato Sensu Programs
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of the Courses in Stricto Sensu Graduate Programs
Respondents: Students in Master's and Doctoral Programs
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Services Provided by SAMA (Undergraduate Students)
Respondents: Students served by SAMA
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Continuing Teacher Education
Respondents: Faculty who participated in the Training
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Unesc's Institutional Image by Organized Civil Society
Respondents: 18 Institutions: Public, Private, and NGOs from Amrec and Amesc.
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Citizenship Houses
Respondents: Attended Public
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Integrated Clinics
Respondents: Target Audience
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Extension Policies
Respondents: Students and faculty participating in extension activities
Type of Evaluation: Evaluation of Research Policies
Respondents: Faculty involved in research projects and students from graduate programs.
